<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n I love to do my own little “coverage” ala Joan Rivers so here are my hits and misses in no particular order, would love to know what yours were too……<\/p>\n <\/p>\n THE HITS<\/p>\n Notice? a theme here? Yep, most were sparkly silvery and fabulous!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n THE MISSES OR NEAR MISSES<\/p>\n Now I am not going to say these are the worst<\/em> dressed but they were big disappointments to me, I have for fun included what I would have put them in if I were their stylist (if any of you are reading this call me)!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Love J Lo for her energetic personality and she is the quintessential entertainer! She undoubtedly,? has a fabulous shape but this look is getting old, its always plunging and sparkly! Jen (yes we are on that kind of basis) please change it up and do something different and unexpected like these more conservative but incredibly elegant and dazzling numbers? (and maybe avoid the plunge to the navel just once<\/em> even though you sure do pull it off:)<\/p>\n ..<\/p>\n Oh dear Kiera, you are one of my faves and you are a classic beauty but really? This? Oh no, a colossal no. I would have loved seeing you in one of these dreamy and ethereal numbers that do you justice…..<\/p>\n <\/p>\n OK first off this is an improvement over the mullet and gray jersey debacle a few years ago and you are looking quite svelte (huge kudos to you) but this menswear meets? blingy babe just isn’t doing it for me. How about one of these black slimming numbers, slenderizing but with a nice amount of sparkle…..<\/p>\n Kerry you are always one I watch because you have beautiful style however this was just wrong in my humble opinion. The length, the color combinations, the red shoes with the pink\/blue gown……wrong. I can see both of the suggested dresses very much being your style….<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Pretty girl, great hair but this dress failed miserably. It fit wrong, looked saggy, the color did nothing for her and she could do SO? much better! She needed color and something more form fitting!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Overall it was a fun and entertaining show, absolutely love Tina and Amy.?? They are practically irreplaceable! The best speeches of the night for me went to Michael Keaton and Julianne Moore, heartfelt and real……I was so happy for both. I also love Eddie Redmayne? from The Theory of Everything. A movie I am seeing this week, cannot wait.<\/p>\n And was equally thrilled to see Boyhood take the top prize though they were all such great contenders.? I am so out of the movie loop it is ridiculous….will be making up for my absence in theaters by the weekend:)<\/p>\n This is going into an area I do not normally venture into however I was completely alarmed and deeply troubled as were millions of others at E Online’s Giuliana Rancic’s weight, she looked frightening. This is simply not OK and it is unconscionable and irresponsible to me<\/span> for a network to allow a spokesperson who clearly has an eating disorder to go on and glamorize what is obviously an epidemic in this country.<\/p>\n I have a good friend who treats those with eating disorders for a living and she was so rattled over this too.<\/p>\n You don’t have to agree but think these pictures speak volumes……<\/p>\n So how about you, did you watch and if so what were your high and low points? Love to know! Thanks for stopping in, wishing you a great start to your week. Until tomorrow……<\/p>\n PS If you missed my Seven on Sunday, click here.<\/a><\/p>\n![\"new174-58-300x201\"](\"https:\/\/wp.enchantedhome.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/new174-58-300x201.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> <\/a> <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> <\/a> <\/a> <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> She got a lot of flack for the gloves and for her “lack of personality” but I think she is super elegant and this screams “old hollywood” .? I think her aloofness is really just a shyness which I find endearing personally, you could see this as George was singing her praises during his speech which was such a sweet moment:)<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a> <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a> <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n